barry_king (barry_king) wrote,
barry_king
barry_king

  • Mood:

Letters I've Written, Never Meaning to Send

Dear young programmer,

Thank you for your contribution to open source. I have spent five hours learning your framework, which you have described as "a mature, flexible and robust object-oriented framework that leverages the power of Smarty". I found these qualities to be attractive, and was hoping that the process of learning the framework would pay off down the road in terms of shorter development times and more reliable sanitization of data.

Now, this is in the context of having, the day before, tried another programmer's framework, which very quickly became a baroque tangle of references and dereferences that would have been an absolute nightmare to debug, translated from portuguese into english, yet carrying all the idioms of that rich and noble language which I do not, in fact, speak.

But it put me in mind of language, and how one man's definition may not necessarily match another man's definition. For example:


  1. "Mature" does not simply mean old, with longstanding bugs, and out-of-date documentation that does not address the basic limitations of the framework.
  2. "Flexible" does not mean that there is only one way of sending an error message to the screen, and because of your reliance on a perverse use of sessions and caching, debugging requires a restart of the browser AND the server on every iteration.
  3. "Robust" does not mean that only one error message can be sent per CGI variable. Total.
  4. "Object-Oriented" does not mean that your objects are simply namespaces filled with functions.
  5. "Leverages" does not mean that it makes absolutely no use of Smarty syntax beyond its own specialized tags and at no time communicates the variables it has procured in sanitization back to the Smarty global handle.
  6. "The Power of Smarty" is, simply, that there is a one-to-one relationship between PHP associative and iterative arrays and the presentation on the screen of elements of HTML.


I know these concepts can sometimes be confusing, so I'll do you a favour. I know you chose that particular phrase and its adjectives by copying boilerplate from someone else's framework. So I'll rewrite that phrase for you. Your framework is a "brittle and anaemic collection of unrelated and disorganized files that, in fact, is incapable of operating with Smarty."

Don't feel hard on yourself. You are actually part of a proud tradition of programmers. Programmers who looked at the field of languages, higher-level syntax, forty years of best practices and brilliant semantic representations of data and control structures and decided to turn their back on all that and create a mockup of the same. A mockup that has all the elegance of a tumbling box of wire coat-hangers, all the syntactic cleanliness of a closed sack of collier's boots at the bottom of a mudslide, and a sense of data storage and retrieval as transparent as the accounting ledger of an aging mobster on benzedrine with dyslexia.

Yes, you are part of the proud tradition of PHP. Give yourself a pat on the backside. If you can find it. With both hands. Perhaps by version 17, PHP will have reached the straightforward clarity of TCL.

Yours sincerely,

Barry King
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 2 comments